How is 'paradox' defined in critical thinking?

Prepare for the AICE Critical Thinking Skills Exam with this comprehensive quiz. Study with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each with hints and explanations. Get ready to boost your exam scores!

The definition of 'paradox' in critical thinking aligns with the notion of a scenario that presents two opposing facts or ideas, which, despite seeming contradictory, can lead to a deeper understanding or truth upon further analysis. Paradoxes often challenge our usual ways of thinking and force us to reconsider our assumptions. They play a crucial role in philosophical discussions and logical reasoning, as they can highlight complexities in arguments or situations that may not be immediately obvious.

In this context, identifying a paradox requires recognizing the tension between conflicting perspectives or statements. This recognition can spur insightful reflections on the underlying principles or inconsistencies that may exist in a given argument or theory. Therefore, a paradox is not simply an assertion of falsehood or an easily refutable claim, but rather a nuanced concept that invites exploration and deeper critical examination.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy