What is meant by an intermediate conclusion in the context of an argument?

An intermediate conclusion serves as a stepping stone in an argument, often derived from initial premises but not representing the final argumentative goal. It functions by providing additional reasoning that helps support a more significant primary conclusion. This secondary conclusion is typically built upon evidence or reasoning outlined earlier in the argument, connecting the premises to the main conclusion effectively.

In discussions about logical structures, it’s important to identify how various conclusions relate to one another. An intermediate conclusion is essential because it can clarify the reasoning process and enhance the overall argumentative structure, allowing for a more complex and nuanced discussion. It helps an audience follow the flow of logic and see how various components of the argument interact to lead to the ultimate conclusion.